78.3 F
California, US
Monday, July 27, 2026
Home Blog Page 111

Filing a Joinder in Santa Barbara County Family Law Court

A joinder is a set of documents that can be filed inside of a family law case (divorce and legal separation being the most common) that identifies major financial accounts and freezes those assets until formal court orders are made. In family law cases in Santa Barbara County Family Law Court, when assets and debts are being divided, pension and retirement accounts are often subject to division. While a court order on property division by the Judge will identify a specific division of the asset, it does not always provide enough language to have the account administrator divide the account. This is another set of documents known as a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). A joinder also serves as the initial phase for most QDRO’s in a Santa Barbara County family law court case. Simply put, a joinder can identify and freeze an account during a family law case, and also is required as the initial phase to ultimately divide those accounts in question.

The Joinder Documents: The documents for a joinder are known as Judicial Council forms. These are forms created and used by the California Courts. While the California Courts, and Santa Barbara County family law courts have hundreds of these, there are only a handful that apply to joinders. The first and most common would be the Summons (joinder) FL-375. This form is completed with identifying information about the plan including the account name. This form is not filed at the court, but rather issued by the court. The clerk at Santa Barbara Family Law Courts will stamp a court seal and this serves as a cover sheet when serving the plan administrator, more about that below. Next is a Pleading on Joinder – Employee Benefit Plan – FL-370. This form contains more information about the family law case and also merges in some information about the case such as date of marriage and separation, if a response was filed and if a judgment on property division was entered. This form also includes options for requests the filer is making, including the important request to freeze the account. This could protect the interest in the account until orders are made, for example a spouse is worried the other party may clear the account before they have an order awarding some or all of it to them. Request For Joinder of Employee Benefit Plan And Order – FL-372 is the last in the group that are commonly filed to get the joinder moving in Santa Barbara County Family Law cases. This document is important because it is what the family law clerks in Santa Barbara Courts use as the order. It is stamped and signed by court staff making it an order of the court. The orders typically include a freeze on the account as well as “joining”, bringing the account holder into the court case.

The Serving of the Joinder: Now that the joinder documents have been prepared and filed/processed with the court, the next requirement is process serve. Simply put, the documents need to be given to the plan administrator. The court does not notify the joined party of the documents, but rather leaves that requirement to the filing party. Without this serve, the plan administrator has no idea they even exists. Getting these documents to the plan administrator is what allows them to follow the order issues by the court. A very important phase because if the account administrator does not know about the order, how are they suppose to enforce or apply it to the account in question. There are different options for serving joinders in a Santa Barbara County Court family law case, and most common would be personal service. Any person over 18, not a party to your case can simply personally deliver the documents to the plan administrator. While it may be easy to find a friend or family member to do so, most plan administrators are not located in Santa Barbara, with some even being outside of California. In situations like this, a process server in Santa Barbara may not even be of assistance. You can find process servers local to the plan administrator and for a fee, they will deliver the documents and complete a proof of service to file back at Santa Barbara Family Law Court.  Another propular option is serve by mail. Within this there are 2 common options and simply mailing documents to the administrator does not meet the requirements. For mail, the Court Clerk at your family law court will need to see proof the administrator actually got these documents. For plan administrators outside of California a USPS certified mail with green card return receipt will work. Package the documents and add the appropriate USPS forms and usually within a week or two a certified mail receipt returns to you with a signature from the recipient which can be filed with the proof of service to the court. For plan administrators inside California serve with Notice and Acknowledgment and Receipt meets the serve requirement. This is similar to the mailing option above, but instead of USPS tracking. An additional form is included in the mail (FL-117 Notice and Acknowledgement of Receipt) in which when the recipient gets the package they can sign this confirming they received. Instructions will indicate you need to give them 2 copies of this and include a pre addressed and postage paid envelope for them to return this form to you. Again, this will be filed with the proof of service at the court. This option may not always be the best since large account administrators may take a long time to complete and review or may not even sign and return. You can contact your plan and they will let you know the best way to serve them. No matter which option you choose, the court requires that the person served has the appropriate forms to respond or contest. Just like the initial serve on the divorce or legal separation case where the respondant was served with a blank response form, the same applies here. The forms for this joinder process would be FL-373 Responsive Declaration to Motion for Joinder and FL-374 Notice of Appearance and Response of Employee Benefit Plan. Easily enough include these blank forms with the court processed joinder documents when serving the plan administrator.

While this covers the top level aspects of joinders in Santa Barbara County Family Law cases, there are always exceptions and special circumstances. For situations like these, or as a good starting point, a QDRO or Pension Division Attorney in Santa Barbara can help provide guidance. Not all attorneys list QDRO or Pension Divisions, so you can expand your search to Family Law Attorneys in Santa Barbara for more options. Since these documents are more often procedural than contested, Legal Document Assistants in Santa Barbara can also help with preparing, filing and serving.

Man’s best friend could cost you more than you’d expect

In December, The Sun posted an article in which a Riverside man cut the throat of a pit bull who had attacked his poodle while they were out walking the neighborhood. At about 9:45 a.m. that Saturday morning, the owner of the pit bull saw her dog with a poodle in its mouth after it had come into their yard. Three men tried to pry the poodle out of the pit bull’s mouth, one being the owner 30-year-old Rudy Jesus Barajas. Finally after many attempts Barajas grabbed the pit bull by the back of the neck after an attempt by the pit bull to bite him, thereafter the pit bull released the poodle from his grips. Barajas then reportedly took the pit bull by the back of the neck and dragged the pit bull to his home and cut its throat. Both dogs died and Barajas was placed under arrest at about 10:30 a.m. due to the stabbing of the dog. California law allows a property owner to protect himself and his pet when attacked. However, the willful killing of an animal can bring felony charges. Both Barajas’ mother and step-father do not believe him to be violent but rather just protecting himself from the attack.

Dogs are seen as man’s best friend and family protectors, but they can be dangerous when caught at the wrong time. Aside from family owned and trained/tamed dogs, there are countless ownerless dogs roaming the Inland Empire. Dogs have predatory instincts and it is their nature to want to protect their territory, family, and selves in any instance when they feel threatened. Dogs that are outdoors in yards can be provoked when something or someone they are not familiar with comes in contact with them. While dogs can be trained and tamed, we must remember that animals are still subject to instant changes in mood and behavior that can be deadly.

If a dog does find itself in an altercation with another dog, or even another human un-familiar to the dog, it is never certain what they could do and what the potential outcome could be. Countless times we have heard stories of friendly dogs being accused of an attack, and in many situations just because they were frightened and trying to protect themselves or owners. Other times dogs are out of their yard and roaming the streets and encounter other animals or people trying to help them home. Either way, a dog attack is serious and can even be at times life threatening, especially to small children or other smaller dogs/pets who do not have the strength to protect themselves against a strong or large dog.  In a blink of an eye an accident could occur and the lives of the pets, the animal owners as well as the victims can change.

When dogs attack and cause serious injuries the victims do have rights in California to recover for their injuries and even damages. Even if the damage is minor, you are still entitled to compensation to cover the cost of medical bills and other possible property damage. If you or someone you know was victim of a dog bite, it is important that you find a dog bite attorney in Montclair that can expertly represent you and has a history of helping victims dealing with dog and animal bite cases.

Justin H. King is an experienced personal injury attorney in  Montclair that represents victims in Montclair and throughout the Inland Empire. His firm, The Law Offices of Justin H. King provides representation for victims involved in serious and traumatic accidents pertaining to auto accidents, wrongful death claims and more. Mr. King vigorously and compassionately represents his injury victims against insurance companies as he has achieved numerous six and seven figure results for his clients. You can visit his website, schedule a consultation at his office located at 3633 Inland Empire Blvd., # 250 Ontario, CA 91764, or call the following number 1 909-297-5001.

Car Crosses Over Center Median Killing One And Leaving Others Injured

72-year-old Moreno Valley resident Juan Rios was reported dead in a recent article by The Press-Enterprise. Early morning around 4:20 a.m. a crash occurred between Rios and another driver as he was driving his car in the 2000 block of East Alessandro Boulevard, Riverside police said. A black 2009 Kia Sorento was traveling east on Alessandro and crossed over the center median before hitting Rios’ van. Rios was found dead due to the impact and his 66-year-old passenger was in critical condition. Firefighters had to cut Rios out of the car because the damages to the large vehicle were so detrimental. The driver in the 2009 Kia Sorento was a 26-year old Perris resident, and his passenger, a 22-year-old Moreno Valley resident, suffered moderate injuries. Investigators are looking into whether or not drugs were involved in the accident.

Despite possible criminal charges that could be brought by the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office, the driver of the Kia can also face personal injury and wrongful death claims in a civil proceeding as well as California DMV license administrative hearings. Depending on filing and outcome of charges, the 26-year-old could be looking at time in prison, having his license taken away, and many more setbacks.

After traffic accidents involving death, the DMV can attempt to suspend or revoke licenses at “fatality hearings”. Regardless of criminal charges, the DMV is obligated to keep drivers safe by investigating and removing unsafe drivers from California roadways. Fatality hearings are a category of negligent operator hearings. As the ability to maintain their license and opportunity to work and provide income are at risk for drivers at fault, it is important for them to do their research in order to find a qualified team of DMV Defense Experts that can expertly represent them in any DMV Administrative hearing.

California Drivers Associates is a team of highly trained DMV Defense Administrative Advocates that can help defend people at fatality hearings when their license and driving privileges are at risk of suspension or revocation. Rob Collier is the President and CEO of the business. Mr. Collier is a Distinguished Graduate of the Los Angeles County Sheriff Academy and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Special Weapons and Tactics School. As a member of an Orange County DUI task force, Mr. Collier has made more than 1,000 arrests for DUI. He has also written or reviewed more than 4,000 DUI arrest reports. Visit Rob and his team at their website or contact them at 1-888-281-5244 as they will be happy to answer any questions you may have at a no cost obligation.

The Cost of a DUI can be more than just Jail Time

On September 27, 2017 “The Sun” published an article in which a 26-year-old off -duty LAPD officer crashed his car into the rear of a Nissan, killing three people and injuring another driver.

Edgar Omar Verduzco is suspected of being intoxicated while driving his 2016 Chevy Camaro; it is alleged that Verduzco was speeding in the carpool lane of the southbound 605 Freeway in the Los Angeles area Tuesday night when he rear-ended a Nissan travelling in the number 1 lane, causing the Nissan to burst into flames.  The Nissan’s occupants, a family of three, were unable to free themselves from car, and died in the flames.  The three victims were identified as a man, a wife and their teenage son.

After colliding with the Nissan, Verduzco’s Camaro crashed into a second car, a Scion with a female driver. CHP officer Gersain Chavez estimated the Nissan and Scion to be traveling about 65 mph before the collision happened, but the speed of Verduzco’s Camaro was not exact as witnesses reported only that he was “speeding”.

Although the occupants of the Nissan perished in the flames, the woman driver of the Scion complained of pain from the collision and was taken to an area hospital for medical treatment.

LAPD Chief Charlie Beck spoke at a press conference Wednesday. “My heart goes out to the victims and the families. And I cannot tell you how angry and disappointed I am that a Los Angeles police officer would disregard the law and cause an accident with such awful, awful consequences.”

Beck said the department takes alcohol abuse, particularly driving under the influence, very seriously. The LAPD has opened an administrative investigation.

The Los Angeles Police Protective League, which is the union for LAPD officers, sergeants and lieutenants, said in a statement that if Verduzco is found guilty of what he is accused of then he should suffer the consequences for his reckless actions.

Verduzco was reported to have been held at Men’s Central Jail in downtown Los Angeles with a bail amount of $100,000.

While often times many DUI’s go unseen and even un-convicted, some DUI incidents result in the most horrible and tragic automobile accidents resulting in serious injury and even death.  The consequences of DUI not only affect the driver, but also unsuspecting motorists who happen to be sharing the road.  Motorists could lose much more than they ever anticipated when they set out on the roads; victims from DUI collisions can suffer not only major vehicle damage, but also injuries that could alter them for life, and worst of all, cost them their lives.

If you or anyone you may know was recently involved in any type of DUI, the first steps you should take is to focus on planning your defense with an experienced DUI attorney.

The Law Offices of Manuel J. Barba focuses primarily on defending persons accused of DUI – driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.  They provide professional and experienced DUI defense in the criminal courts throughout Southern California and at the DMV driver safety offices.

Attorney Manuel J. Barba has been awarded the prestigious Forensic Lawyer-Scientist designation by the Chemistry and Law division of the American Chemical Society (ACS-CHAL), and is the ONLY DUI Defense Attorney in the Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Imperial County areas with this designation, which gives him the knowledge and expertise to defend you or someone you may know. For more information on the Law Offices of Manuel J.Barba, you can visit their website or call 866-442- 2722 for a free consultation.

Joinders and California Divorces

In California Family Law cases, when pension or retirement accounts are being divided by way of a QDRO, a joinder is often needed to facilitate the process. This is a series of family law court forms that are prepared, filed with the court, served on an account administrator and then proof of that serve (notification) is filed at the court.

A Joinder refers to both a set of documents and a process. The joinder documents do a few important things with the court. When a divorce or separation order is entered in the court it may address an account to be divided and often times, not much more than that. One important function a Joinder serves is to bring in the specific information about an account that was addressed or will be addressed in a family law case in California. It contains the official name of the account and plan as well as information about the employee who the account was established for. Many of these details by default are not included in a divorce or separation process or documents. Another function the Joinder documents serve is to request the court make a hold or freeze on the account in question. When the Joinder documents are filed with the court the clerk can make an order that prevents the account holder from making any distributions until further notice/order of the court. This is important if you think the other party may be trying to liquidate and conceal assets. It will freeze the account until a QDRO or other order is made by the court. An important note is that joinders can be filed at anytime in the family law case.

The Joinder process is relatively quick and initiates by preparing and filing the joinder and attachments to joinder with the court inside of your already established family law case. The documents are filed and returned to the party by the court clerk on the spot. If requesting a freeze on the account, the documents will have an order having the account administrator do so.  At this point only the court knows about these documents and orders which is why the court requires these documents be served on the account administrator. This is simply a copy of the filed documents, with required blank responses forms, being delivered to the account administrator. If California there are different options for serve, but most common on Joinders would be personal service, mail service with acknowledgment from recipient or certified mail if outside California. Local process servers can facilitate these and provide more information about the timeline and costs. A proof of the completed serve is filed at the court so that the court has record this requirement has been completed.

One thing to note is that the joinder doesn’t serve much function outside what was listed above. It will not divide an account; it will not provide a value or estimation of a portion of the account. Think of a joinder as the initial phase and requirement of the QDRO which will make the order to divide the account. Also important to note, not all types of plans or accounts require a joinder in California. The courts has a guideline for this on their website here, but if you are unsure, contact a QDRO & Pension Division Attorney. These are family law attorneys who either provide QDRO services or attorneys who exclusively handle QDROs. There are also local QDRO document preparation services who can assist with the joinder process.

Hiring A Lawyer to Fight a NY Speeding Ticket Makes Financial Sense

Traffic ticketNobody likes getting speeding tickets. For many Americans, however, paying the ticket won’t break the bank and is an easy way to just “make it go away.” Even for those who want to fight the speeding ticket, many don’t think about hiring a lawyer. After all, wouldn’t it be cheaper to just pay the ticket? In some states, perhaps. But in New York? Definitely not!

How Much Does a Speeding Ticket in NY Really Cost?

The cost of a speeding ticket in New York varies depending on the speed. A NY speeding ticket typically starts at $150 plus a mandatory NYS surcharge of $88-$93. For drivers whose speed is truly excessive – 30 mph over the limit or more – or for those who speed in a work zone or school zone, tickets can range up to $693 (including the surcharge)! That’s nearly $700 not to mention the cost of increased auto insurance, as below.

Then there’s the points that get added onto your license. Each speeding ticket carries at least three points. If you receive six or more points on your license, you win a prize: a driver responsibility assessment (DRA). A DRA of course is not a gift but rather a penalty — $100 per year for the next three years. Each point you accrue after six adds another $25 per year for three years.

That means if this is your second speeding conviction, you could end up spending up over $1,000 for a single ticket between fines and the DRA.

Unfortunately, that’s not even the most expensive part of paying a speeding ticket. The worst comes when your auto insurance provider gets wind of the violation. One speeding ticket can increase your premiums by as much as 21%! With most New Yorkers shelling out between $1,400 and $2,700 annually for auto insurance, even the smallest speeding ticket could result in an additional $294 to $567 per year for three years.

So how much might a single speeding ticket really cost you? It could be close to $1,500 ($150 ticket + $93 surcharge + [$100 DRA x 3 years] + [$294 insurance increase x 3 years]).

How Can Hiring an Attorney Save Money?

There are two possible outcomes that may help you save money in the long run. Either the attorney beats the charges or he/she pleads it down to a non-moving violation. In the first scenario, there are no points or a fine. In the second, the fine is often reduced, there are less points assessed and may ultimately mean there will be no impact your auto insurance. In most cases, hiring a lawyer means you don’t even need to show up to court. And let’s face it, your time is money.

About the Author

Adam H. Rosenblum, Esq. is the principal of The Rosenblum Law Firm.  The Rosenblum Law Firm’s skilled criminal defense and traffic violations attorneys have a reputation for aggressive representation for anyone facing criminal charges and traffic violations that may result in jail time, heavy fines, points and license suspension or revocation.

Photo Credit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/